首页> 外文OA文献 >Why Public Employment Services Always Fail. Double-sided Asymmetric Information and the Replacement of Low-skill Workers in six European Countries
【2h】

Why Public Employment Services Always Fail. Double-sided Asymmetric Information and the Replacement of Low-skill Workers in six European Countries

机译:公共就业服务为何总是失败。欧洲六国的双边不对称信息与低技能工人的替代

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

It has been a general finding across Europe that very few job matches are facilitated by public employment services (PES).The article explains this failure by highlighting the existence of a double-sided asymmetric information problem on the labour market. It is argued that although a PES potentially reduces search costs, both employers and employees have strong incentives not to use PES. The reason is that employers try to avoid the ‘worst’ employees, and employees try to avoid the ‘worst’ employers. Therefore these services get caught in a low-end equilibrium that is almost impossible to escape. The mechanisms leading to this low-end equilibrium are illustrated by means of qualitative interviews with 40 private employers in six European countries.
机译:整个欧洲的普遍发现是,公共就业服务(PES)很少能促进工作匹配。本文通过强调劳动力市场上存在双面不对称信息问题来解释这种失败。有观点认为,尽管PES可能会降低搜索成本,但雇主和雇员都有强烈的动机不使用PES。原因是雇主试图避开“最糟糕”的雇主,而雇员则试图避开“最糟糕”的雇主。因此,这些服务陷入了几乎无法逃脱的低端平衡。通过对六个欧洲国家/地区的40位私人雇主进行定性访谈,可以说明导致这种低端均衡的机制。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号